The AgTech Investment Landscape Has Changed: Startups Need to Step Up Their Game in Comms

There is still capital going into AgTech. But the story investors want to hear has changed.

According to AgFunder, global agrifoodtech investment reached approximately $16.2 billion in 2025. Overall funding was broadly flat, but upstream investment into technologies closer to farming and food production actually grew by around 7%.

Deep tech continues to attract attention too. Deep-tech companies represented 32% of agrifoodtech deals in 2025, compared with 22% a decade ago. At Seed stage, deep-tech companies also raised rounds that were, on average, substantially larger than their non-deep-tech counterparts.

So this isn't a story about investors abandoning agricultural innovation.

But look further along the funding journey and things become more complicated.

The funding premium attached to deep tech at Seed disappears by Series B. Deep-tech agrifood funding remains significantly below its 2021 peak. Deal numbers have fallen. Investors are concentrating capital into fewer companies and asking much harder questions about which technologies can actually become scalable businesses.

For AgTech startups and scale-ups, there is an important communications lesson here.

AgTech startups need to clearly leverage comms to demonstrate that the innovation can translate into adoption, economics and scale.

1. Start with the problem for farmers, OEMs and agribusiness: don't start with your technology (or think sustainability alone will support your narrative)

AgTech has never suffered from a shortage of impressive technologies.

AI. Robotics. Biologicals. Novel crop inputs. Remote sensing. Advanced genetics. Automation. Soil technologies. Precision agriculture.

The challenge is demonstrating why there's pressure for innovation to be adopted at scale, painting a clear picture of the path to commercial growth (and, likely, exit).

For founders immersed in their technology, it can be tempting to communicate around technical novelty: it would be a significant mistake in today's funding environment.

Investors and prospective industry partners, more than ever, want to understand the commercial problem behind it. In a landscape that has received significant funding over the last ten years, but has also seen few strong success stories, positioning and narrative can make a big difference.

Startups must build their story on a very clear, distinctive pain point they are addressing.

What does a farmer, grower, agronomist, distributor or food producer gain from adopting your technology?

Does it reduce labour requirements? Lower input costs? Improve yield? Address resistance? Reduce crop losses? Help manage water scarcity? Make regulatory compliance easier?

And, importantly, is that problem painful enough for somebody to change the way they currently operate?

2. Make commercial progress much more visible

For an early-stage company, scientific progress can legitimately be the story.

As the company matures, the balance needs to shift.

Field trials. Regulatory progress. Commercial partnerships. Distribution agreements. Repeat customers. New markets. Product launches.

These aren't secondary company updates. They are the evidence that starts answering the biggest question surrounding many AgTech businesses: can this technology move from a promising innovation to something the industry will adopt at scale?

That is particularly important when you look at where investment is going.

Recent investment analysis has highlighted areas such as crop inputs and enhancements, precision-agriculture software and selected animal-health technologies among categories producing stronger risk-adjusted outcomes. Farm robotics continues to attract investment too, particularly where automation addresses clear labour and productivity constraints.

There is a common thread.

The strongest stories are increasingly connected to identifiable, expensive problems and a credible route towards solving them commercially.

Your communications should make that connection impossible to miss.

3. Show that you understand how agriculture actually buys

There is another layer of credibility that is particularly important in AgTech.

Understanding the science is not the same as understanding the market.

Agriculture has its own adoption cycles, distribution structures, seasonal constraints, regulatory requirements and risk calculations. A solution can be technically superior and still struggle commercially if adopting it introduces too much complexity or uncertainty.

This is where communications can do considerably more than promote the product.

Good thought leadership demonstrates that your team understands the world your customers operate in.

Talk about the pressures growers and breeders are facing. Discuss how purchasing decisions are changing. Explain regulatory developments. Have a perspective on adoption barriers for OEMs. Show you're aware of labour shortages. Bring your agronomists, technical experts and commercial leaders into the conversation.

Reduce the perceived distance between "interesting technology company" and "company that understands this industry well enough to become an important part of it."

For prospective corporate partners and investors alike, that distinction will make you look believable, professional and – therefore – more trustworthy.

4. If you are an AI-native business, don't let AI become your entire story

AI will continue to attract capital and attention across agriculture. But simply attaching AI to an agricultural application is unlikely to be enough to differentiate a company for long. This is a narrative mistake we see very often.

The more ubiquitous AI becomes, the more important the underlying problem, proprietary knowledge, data, product and commercial model become.

The interesting question isn't whether your company uses AI.

It is what your technology allows a farmer, agronomist or agricultural business to do that they couldn't realistically do before, and what measurable value that creates.

For companies genuinely building defensible AI-enabled AgTech, communications should help audiences understand that distinction.

Otherwise, there is a real risk of an interesting agricultural technology being reduced to the same AI story being told by hundreds of other startups.

5. Build the case for your next round before you start fundraising

This is probably the biggest communications mistake we see startups make.

They begin thinking seriously about investor visibility when the next fundraising process is already approaching. By then, you are trying to compress 18 months of progress into a few months of communications activity.

Instead, think about the period between rounds as the time when you build the evidence for the next one.

If you raised on the strength of your science, what will investors need to believe before your Series A? If you raised your Series A around successful validation, what evidence of commercial adoption will you need before Series B?

Then work backwards.

Your partnerships, milestones, media coverage, founder thought leadership, LinkedIn presence and website should gradually reinforce that progression.

The objective isn't to constantly communicate that you are fundraising.

Quite the opposite.

By the time you enter the market, an investor researching the company should be able to see the progress that has taken place without relying exclusively on your pitch deck to explain it.

From promising technology to credible company

The AgTech funding environment is undoubtedly more difficult than it was at the height of the market.

But the more interesting change is that it is becoming more selective.

Investors haven't stopped believing in agricultural innovation. Capital is still reaching deep tech, crop inputs, precision agriculture, robotics, AI and other technologies tackling significant problems across the food and agricultural system.

What has changed is the level of evidence companies increasingly need to provide as they mature.

And communications should mature alongside them.

Early on, the technology itself may legitimately be the biggest story you have.

Over time, the story needs to become bigger: the problem you solve, the customers choosing you, the economics supporting adoption, the industry partners backing you and the evidence that what started as promising science is becoming a scalable company.

The AgTech investment market has moved beyond funding innovation on the promise of innovation alone.

Your communications strategy should do the same.


EDERA Lab is a marketing and communications partner for deep tech and industrial innovation companies, helping them turn scientific and technical progress into a credible commercial story across earned and owned channels. Explore our marketing and communications services, or get in touch to discuss how your narrative, media profile and milestones can build the case for your next stage of growth.

Chiara Molena

Chiara Molena is a strategic marketing and communications expert specializing in climate tech, industrial biotech, and deep-tech innovation. With 15+ years of experience in brand management, media relations, and B2B marketing, she helps startups and investors craft compelling narratives that drive visibility, trust, and growth.

Next
Next

One-Off PR vs. Ongoing Communications: What’s the Difference, and What Are the Trade-Offs?